← Back to Models & Tools
Credit Series · Guide 06

Credit Agreement Basics

What's actually in a credit agreement, the 12 provisions every analyst gets tested on, and how to navigate 300 pages of loan docs in 2 hours.

How to Read a Credit Agreement

A leveraged loan credit agreement is typically 250–400 pages of dense legal text. No analyst reads it sequentially — the skill is knowing which sections to go to first and what to look for in each one. Most of the document is boilerplate; the meaningful provisions are clustered in 8 sections and their related definitions. The table below gives you the map.

Section What It Contains Typical Length Analyst Priority
Article I — Definitions Every defined term in the document; includes EBITDA, Permitted Debt, Excess Cash Flow, Change of Control 60–90 pages High — start here
Article II — The Loans Facility amounts, maturity dates, amortization schedule, interest rate mechanics, prepayment premiums 30–50 pages High
Article III — Conditions Precedent What must be true for the loan to fund and for future draws; borrower certifications 5–8 pages Medium
Article IV — Representations & Warranties Borrower's factual representations as of closing; basis for fraud/default claims if false 10–15 pages Medium
Article V — Affirmative Covenants Things the borrower must do: deliver financials, maintain insurance, preserve corporate existence 10–15 pages Medium
Article VI — Negative Covenants Things the borrower cannot do without consent: incur debt, pay dividends, sell assets, make investments 20–35 pages Very High
Article VII — Financial Covenants Maintenance tests (if any): max leverage, min coverage, min liquidity 3–8 pages Very High
Article VIII — Events of Default Triggers that give lenders the right to accelerate and enforce; grace periods 8–12 pages Very High

In practice, experienced analysts do the following when they receive a new credit agreement: (1) go immediately to the Definitions section and read the EBITDA definition, including every permitted add-back; (2) read Article VI Negative Covenants for all debt incurrence baskets and restricted payments permissions; (3) read Article VII Financial Covenants for the test levels, testing dates, and cure provisions; (4) read Article VIII Events of Default for cross-default thresholds and grace periods. Everything else is reviewed in detail during full underwriting but is not where you find the deal-making provisions.

Key Definitions — Where Deals Are Won and Lost

The Definitions section is where sophisticated sponsors and their counsel insert flexibility. A deal at 5.5x leverage on the face of it may, on closer inspection of the EBITDA definition, involve an EBITDA figure that is 15–20% higher than actual EBITDA. The economic leverage is closer to 6.3x. Lenders who do not read definitions carefully underwrite at the wrong leverage.

The EBITDA Definition and the Add-Back Game

Credit agreement EBITDA begins with GAAP operating income (or net income), adds back interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, and then adds a long list of "permitted adjustments." The permitted adjustments are where the stretching happens. Common categories include:

EBITDA Bridge — From Reported to Credit Agreement EBITDA
Item Amount ($M)
Reported GAAP EBITDA $100.0
Add: Restructuring Charges (workforce reduction) $5.0
Add: Non-Recurring Items (integration costs, consulting) $3.0
Add: Run-Rate Synergies (supply chain savings, projected 18 mo.) $8.0
Add: Stock-Based Compensation (non-cash) $2.5
Add: Pro Forma EBITDA from Q3 Acquisition (annualized) $3.8
Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA $122.3

The company has $100M of actual EBITDA. The credit agreement computes $122.3M — a 22% inflation. A $440M loan facility covenanted at 5.5x Credit Agreement EBITDA implies "real" leverage of $440M / $100M = 4.40x in the lender's mind; the actual economic leverage is 4.40x if the add-backs materialize, and 4.40x only if the $8M in run-rate synergies fully realize. An analyst who does not recompute cash leverage from scratch is flying blind.

Permitted Debt Baskets

Negative covenants restrict the incurrence of additional debt — but every credit agreement has a set of baskets that carve out specific categories of debt the borrower can incur without lender consent. Common baskets include:

Excess Cash Flow Definition

Excess Cash Flow (ECF) is one of the most negotiated definitions in a leveraged loan because it determines how much of the company's annual free cash flow is mandatorily swept to repay the term loan. The definition is intentionally complex because borrowers want to deduct as many items as possible.

ECF = Adjusted EBITDA − Cash Interest Expense − Cash Tax Payments − Capital Expenditures (net of insurance/condemnation proceeds) − Mandatory Debt Amortization − Permitted Investments (acquisitions and approved capex) − Changes in Working Capital (if uses cash) ± Various permitted adjustments

The sweep percentage applies to the resulting ECF figure and is typically tiered by leverage: 50% sweep when leverage is above 4.5x, stepping down to 25% when between 3.5x and 4.5x, and 0% when below 3.5x. The company can also reduce its ECF sweep obligation by making voluntary prepayments during the year.

Representations and Warranties

Reps and warranties are factual statements the borrower makes as of the closing date (and, for some reps, as of each borrowing). The key ones from a credit risk perspective are:

The MAC clause is important to understand conceptually even if it rarely triggers in practice. Courts in Delaware and New York have interpreted MAC narrowly, requiring that the adverse change be (a) material, (b) company-specific rather than industry-wide, and (c) durationally significant — a bad quarter is not a MAC. The handful of successful MAC invocations have involved fraud, undisclosed liabilities, or regulatory actions that fundamentally changed the business.

Negative Covenants — The Restricted List

Article VI of the credit agreement contains the covenants that most directly govern what a private equity-backed company can and cannot do while it has a loan outstanding. These are the provisions a lender spends the most time negotiating, because they define the scope of lender consent rights.

No Additional Debt (With Baskets)

The borrower shall not incur, create, assume, or permit to exist any additional funded debt except as permitted by the Permitted Debt baskets described above. The baskets are the negotiation; the prohibition is the default rule.

No Liens Beyond Permitted

The borrower cannot pledge assets to any other party except through the Permitted Liens schedule. This protects the lender's first (or second) priority security interest in the collateral. Lenders take a first-priority lien on substantially all assets of the borrower and its material subsidiaries — accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, real property, intellectual property, and equity in subsidiaries.

No Mergers Without Consent

The borrower cannot merge with, acquire, or be acquired by another entity without lender consent or satisfaction of a pro forma ratio test. This prevents a change in the credit by substituting a different obligor or dramatically changing the business mix.

No Dividends / Distributions Beyond Basket

The borrower cannot make restricted payments (dividends, equity repurchases, repayment of subordinated debt) except through permitted baskets. In direct lending, this is often a hard prohibition with only an equity cure basket exception. In TLB, the Restricted Payments basket may be significantly more permissive.

No Asset Sales Above Threshold Without Prepay

Asset sales above the de minimis threshold (typically $5–10M) must either (a) be reinvested in replacement assets within 18 months or (b) trigger a mandatory prepayment of the term loan in an amount equal to net proceeds. This prevents borrowers from harvesting assets to fund operations or pay distributions without deleveraging.

No Amendments to Material Contracts

The borrower cannot amend its material customer contracts, supplier agreements, or organizational documents in a manner materially adverse to lenders without consent. This protects against post-closing deterioration in the business's contractual position.

Events of Default

An Event of Default (EOD) gives lenders the right to accelerate the loan — demand immediate repayment of all principal and interest. In practice, lenders rarely accelerate immediately; they use the EOD as leverage to extract an amendment, waiver, or restructuring on favorable terms. Understanding the grace periods and thresholds is critical.

Event of Default Grace Period Notes
Failure to Pay Interest 5 business days Grace period allows for wire transfer delays; intentional non-payment is immediate EOD
Failure to Pay Principal 3 business days Principal non-payment is the most serious trigger; rarely involves good-faith delay
Financial Covenant Breach None (but cure period) No grace, but equity cure right typically lasts 15–20 business days after delivery of compliance certificate
Non-Financial Covenant Breach 30 days to cure Affirmative and negative covenant breaches carry a cure period for non-intentional violations
Cross-Default to Other Debt After grace on underlying Typically applies to other debt exceeding $5–25M threshold; prevents strategic selective default
Change of Control None Defined carefully — sponsor selling its controlling stake without lender consent triggers acceleration
Bankruptcy / Insolvency None Filing of voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy; automatic stay prevents enforcement upon filing
Material Judgment Outstanding 60 days after judgment Uninsured judgment above threshold (typically $10–25M) that is not stayed or satisfied

Cross-Default Provision in Detail

The cross-default provision is one of the most consequential in the credit agreement. It says: if the borrower defaults on any other debt above a certain threshold (typically $5M–25M, negotiated at signing), that default also constitutes an EOD under this credit agreement. The purpose is to prevent a borrower from selectively not paying its term loan while continuing to service other obligations — it equalizes the negotiating position across the capital structure.

In complex capital structures with a first lien term loan and second lien notes, the cross-default thresholds are calibrated carefully. First lien lenders typically include a cross-default to the second lien notes; second lien holders include a cross-default to the first lien. Both sets of documents will have cross-acceleration provisions: a default in one does not necessarily cause an acceleration, but an acceleration in one does trigger acceleration in the other.

Excess Cash Flow Sweep — Mechanics

The mandatory ECF sweep is the primary mechanism through which term loans deleverage faster than their stated amortization schedule. The sweep is calculated annually (based on the fiscal year), and is due within 90–120 days of year-end (concurrent with the annual compliance certificate). The tiered structure creates a natural deleveraging flywheel: as leverage falls, the sweep percentage drops, freeing more cash flow for operations and, eventually, for distributions.

ECF Sweep — Tiered Example
Leverage Level Sweep Percentage Implication
Above 4.50x 50% High leverage — lenders capture majority of FCF for repayment
3.50x – 4.50x 25% Mid leverage — borrower retains 75% of ECF; distributions possible
Below 3.50x 0% Low leverage — no mandatory sweep; full FCF retained by company

Example: Company with $440M term loan, $86M Adjusted EBITDA, 5.12x leverage at year-end. ECF = $86M − $40M interest − $18M taxes − $32M capex − $4.4M mandatory amort = $9.6M. Sweep = 50% × $9.6M = $4.8M additional prepayment. The voluntary prepay credit: any voluntary prepays made during the year reduce the sweep dollar-for-dollar, incentivizing sponsors to prepay when the liquidity is available rather than wait for the mandatory sweep date.

The EBITDA Add-Back Game

Every sponsor's counsel negotiates add-backs at closing. The "general catch-all" add-back for non-recurring items is where the most aggressive flexibility lives — there is no GAAP definition of non-recurring, and courts have generally upheld whatever the parties agreed to in the definition. When you are analyzing a new deal, recompute EBITDA from GAAP operating income using only your own judgment about what is genuinely non-recurring. Then compare your number to the credit agreement EBITDA. The spread is the "add-back gap" — your measure of how much the credit agreement EBITDA overstates economic earning power. A gap above 15% warrants a serious conversation about whether the stated leverage ratio reflects the true risk. A gap above 25% is a red flag.

Interview Questions

Q: What is the first thing you read in a credit agreement and why?

The Definitions section, specifically the definition of "Adjusted EBITDA." Every covenant, every ratio test, and every basket is keyed off this number. If the EBITDA definition is inflated — by aggressive add-backs, broad synergy provisions, or uncapped catch-all language — the entire risk framework built around it is understated. Once you understand the EBITDA definition, you can compute real leverage versus stated leverage, and the gap tells you how much cushion the covenants actually provide.

Q: What is a cross-default provision and why does it matter in a leveraged capital structure?

A cross-default provision states that a default on any other material debt (above the threshold amount) constitutes an Event of Default under this facility. In a leveraged capital structure with a first lien term loan and second lien notes, cross-defaults mean no tranche can be isolated in a selective default scenario. If the company misses a coupon on the second lien notes, that triggers an EOD on the first lien term loan, giving first lien lenders acceleration rights even though they were paid. This prevents a borrower from playing creditor classes against each other — once any lender has an EOD, all lenders have leverage at the table simultaneously.

Q: How does the Excess Cash Flow sweep work, and why is the step-down structure important?

ECF is net free cash flow after interest, taxes, capex, and mandatory amortization — loosely, the cash the company generated that is available to lenders beyond their contractual payments. The sweep requires the borrower to prepay a percentage of ECF annually — typically 50% at high leverage, stepping down to 25% and eventually 0% at lower leverage levels. The step-down matters because it creates a deleveraging incentive: as the company pays down debt and leverage falls, more of the ECF stays inside the business rather than being swept to the lender. For a sponsor modeling the return on an LBO, the sweep is a material determinant of how quickly they can get to the leverage step-down and begin retaining cash for distributions.

Next: Distressed & Restructuring → Practice in Mock Interview